Flip Flop … or a Justifiable Change of Mind?

When you or I learn new information and rethink our personal position it’s called changing our mind, but when an executive or politician does it, we call it flip flopping.

The truth is, we all change our minds.

If we didn’t we’d be accused of living in the past and not growing.

The secret to communication success is how you explain your new view to people.

Reporters are trained to trick naive executives and politicians into flip flopping on issues.

Sometimes though, a flip flop is what it is, intentionally done by a spokesperson in a purely manipulative way, i.e. when a politician takes a strong philosophical stand on an issue and then changes his message after he learns most people polled think differently.

If you’re going to change your mind you better know how to manage your message before a reporter puts words in your mouth and tags you as a flip flop artist.

Journalists are skilled at leading even innocent subjects into a flip flop ambush, and when the interviewee realizes too late that they inadvertently contradicted themselves, they panic and end up making it worse. A flip flop mistake made by an inexperienced spokesperson can turn into an outright lie, and when that happens careers go off the rails.

For example, a reporter might sneak in a question about your stance on raising taxes, and in an unguarded moment you answer based on what you think voters want to hear. The reporter then says, “but last year you voted the opposite way in Congress to have tax increases repealed. Now you’re saying a tax increase is OK? Do you mean it’s OK when you vote for a tax hike, but not when your opponent votes this way?

An executive or politician with proper media training will see the trap a mile away and not get caught in it, or at the very least know how to smoothly get out of it.

When a politician flip flops to gain votes it’s quickly perceived as self-serving by voters. However, when a politician has a fundamental change in philosophy and he can clearly describe why the change of heart, there is a better chance of having it regarded by voters as legitimately changing your mind for the good of the public based on new information.

 A few years ago Mike Huckabee changed his mind about using negative attack ads to bash Mitt Romney regarding of all things, Romney’s “flip flop” record. Huckabee at first agreed to run the negative ads, and then pulled them after already investing heavily to produce the spots. At the end of the day voters respected him for his change of heart and mind.

One of the most famous flip flops that also worked in favor of a politician was when George Wallace, who was at the time a hard-line segregationist, changed his mind in the late 70s and apologized to black voters. He was elected Governor in 1980.

Flip floppers often stubbornly stay on message. Why? Well for one reason it’s a good way to hide your personal beliefs. Spokespeople often mistakenly believe that staying on message is a safe zone, when in fact people really want to know you are engaged and not just a talking head.

Oscar Wilde wrote, “Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative.”

Staying on message regardless of the question is usually a mistake. If you stay calm when talking with reporters (you learn to do this in part by understanding through media training how journalists do their jobs) you will be able to think on your feet and answer in a way that supports your agenda, not theirs.

Losing your cool when accused of flip flopping can be career suicide.

2012 Presidential hopeful Herman Cain yelled in frustration at a reporter regarding a question that tried to make it look like Cain was flip flopping.

Turns out there was no basis for the flip flop insinuation, but yelling is not the way to defend yourself when news media ask you a question that makes you feel uncomfortable. It’s often a tactic they use to bait you into making a communication mistake. When they see you are not a skilled communicator and that you easily react, they will repeatedly drop bait in front of you hoping you will snap at it. Cain spends an inordinate amount of time defending statements he never made, let alone flip flopped on.

As I wrote above, flip flopping is often simply the act of changing your mind. It’s all in the interpretation. The secret is how well you communicate, whether it involves purposefully flip flopping, or not having the skills to effectively convince people of your new perspective.

Politicians who fail to communicate clearly lose the respect of voters.

According to news reports, British Columbia politician Harry Bloy, Cabinet Minister of Social Development, was shuffled to the back of the herd not because he flip flopped, but because of what is described by media as poor communication skills. Many regard him as a good administrator, but whenever he was questioned by reporters, he failed to deliver.

Here’s an excerpt from an Op-Ed piece by Vaughn Palmer about Minister Bloy;
Bloy had no appetite for talking to the media nor was he any good at it. The B.C. Liberals, after a considerable application of resources and staff time in media training, concluded he was a hopeless case. So they deliberately isolated him, recognizing that the only thing more embarrassing than not making him available to talk to reporters was to make him available and have his weaknesses paraded in print or over the airwaves. On those rare occasions when contact was unavoidable, the minister would usually be restricted to talking over a speaker phone, with ministry staff on hand to correct the record in the event he fumbled his pre-rehearsed lines.”

Flip Flop sound bites are often due to poor media communication skills.

Posted in Media Training | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

You’re Only as Good as Your Worst Quote

Sharon Henderson, from Dialogue+, a magazine for retirement residence professionals, focused on a very important media communications topic in a review she did of my book, When the Headline Is YOU.

Sharon began the review with, “Media calls and crisis situations can be fear-evoking moments when you’re the one returning the call on behalf of your retirement residence.”

She went on to reference the following line in my book,

People who talk to the media are only as good as their worst quote.” 

Sharon expanded upon this by writing, “You need to proactively approach every media situation, not only your message but also how to deliver it so that it makes its way into what is reported. Next to having media training with Ansell himself, this book will give you strategies that will help you create meaningful responses and maintain trust with your key stakeholders.”

You can read more of Sharon’s book review here.

Posted in Media Training | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Politicians Are People Too

Mark Ruggiero of Campaigns & Elections recently reviewed my book, When the Headline Is YOU, and wrote, “It is a must-read for anyone who interacts with journalists and reporters, but it is especially relevant for politicians and operatives and for behind-the-scenes staffers who are routinely tasked with developing media messages in challenging, newsworthy situations.”

My book and media training practice appeal in large part to spokespeople and executives in the corporate world. Sometimes people forget though that the skills you need to communicate clearly with anyone at any level, whether you are a CEO, a not-for-profit spokesperson, a politician, or a civil service staffer are all relatively the same. The commonality is clear communication and being able to say it like you mean it, and look like you mean it.

People also just want to know that you understand their perspective, and that you are genuinely paying attention to their concerns. People don’t care how much you know, they need to know how much you care. It’s a common mistake politicians make every day. People want to know what you are going to do to fix the problem, and prevent it from happening again. They don’t care how the issue affects the politician or the party. Voters only care how it affects them, and their families, and their livelihoods.

Every day we see politicians get drawn into arguments with reporters.

The reality is that you cannot win an argument with a news company that is holding such a large megaphone. You can however disarm them, and turn the argument into a debate that gets your message across in the way you intended.

Feed journalists sound bites that don’t bite you back.

Politicians can learn communication strategies that will help them manage their conversation with voters and journalists more effectively.

Politicians sometimes forget that they are always on. There is no downtime. Voters judge politicians whether they are on a podium addressing thousands, in front of a TV camera dealing with a crisis, or talking to a small group of seniors.

The communication process is the same regardless of the venue or agenda.

Politicians are often their own impromptu publicists, which means they have to learn to think on their feet when their team is not there to watch their back or feed them info.

Politicians get nervous just like everyone else.

Alleviating nervousness on the podium or in front of a TV camera is a learned skill. Simple things like learning to breath properly when you speak is critical to effectively managing your message. It’s also important to speak to one person in the crowd or media scrum per thought. Don’t jump all over the place or look over the audience’s heads while you address them. Make it personal and conversational. Focus on one thought at a time. Think about what you say as you say it and don’t jump ahead trying to second guess your audience.

Engage people by making it easy to follow you.

Granted, some politicians seem more naturally inclined in the communication department than others, but you know the old saying, “The harder I work, the luckier I get.”

You can read Mark’s reveiw of my book here – Campaigns & Elections

 

Posted in Media Training, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Media Training TIPS for Rupert Murdoch

I’ve been in Europe this week, Amsterdam, Paris, and London, and while here was called upon by the BBC to offer a few MEDIA TIPS to Rupert Murdoch before he goes before the House of Commons, investigating phone hacking and police bribery charges against Murdoch’s news media company, News Corp.

James Menendez interviewed me for BBC Newshour World Service on Monday, the day before Murdoch is due to formally defend the allegations.

Standard and Poors has already placed News Corp on Credit Watch “negative” based on reports the allegations are being investigated internationally, including by the FBI.

Newshour’s John Menendez opened the interview asking me “Just how much training does Mr. Murdoch need?” I responded “He needs a boatload of training. Just because he owns the media doesn’t mean he’s any good at dealing with it.”

Menendez asked what type of advice I would give Murdoch, and I first described how investigators would bait him in an effort to get him to snap and display his legendary arrogance. I also told him Murdoch is going to get a taste of his own medicine.

Menendez wanted to know if it’s a case of being prepared like a good Boy Scout, and I said, “absolutely.” We talked about Murdoch already getting caught in the “back peddling” trap where only a few days previous he stated he thought his company was doing “fairly well” and they had only made “minor mistakes,” and now today his right arm lady, Rebekah Brooks, recently resigned head of News Corp’s U.K. newspaper subsidiary, has been arrested, and anyone associated with him is under intense scrutiny.

I told Menendez Murdoch has to show an awful lot of humility and genuine sincerity, and demonstrate that he “gets” what he did was wrong and that no one cares more about his scandal than he does.

He needs to introduce a code of integrity for his reporters to follow religiously.

PODCAST BBC NewsHour Jeff Ansell interview - Windows wma       Mp3 iPAD

Posted in Media Training, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rupert Murdoch’s Untamed Arrogance

Rupert Murdoch may be considered the world’s leading media mogul,
but when it comes to commenting to and answering questions from reporters,
his ability leaves a lot to be desired.

Here in Paris, as I read the European edition of the Wall Street Journal, Murdoch’s untamed arrogance comes through loud and clear in his quotes.

According to Murdoch, News Corporation handled the crisis “extremely well,” admitting only that his company made “minor mistakes.”

Asked if he was aggravated by the negative headlines,
Murdoch responded he was “just getting annoyed.”

After all the tumult to this point regarding the phone hacking scandal of thirteen year old murdered girl, Milly Dowler, who was missing for six months, you would think Murdoch would realize humility is called for now – not hubris.

Posted in Media Training, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Editors & Reporters Break the Law to Generate News

 

How far will journalists go to get a story?

Apparently further than most people think.

In order to get leads for a story, News of the World, a Rupert Murdoch publication, allegedly hacked the voicemail of a thirteen year old girl who was thought to be missing, but was actually murdered.

I’m writing this post from London, in the eye of the storm, and even though news these days travels around the world at Twitter-like speed, the “tone” of this news event now resonates much deeper with my feet planted on British soil. The impact is intensely personal for people living here compared to those thousands of miles away, but from a business perspective, the news industry aftershock will resonate around the world, and according to some may even change the face of news.

It’s frightening to think something like this could happen to an innocent young girl, or to anyone anywhere for that matter.

Rupert Murdoch, who owns one of the largest news media companies in the world, including Fox News, isn’t the only executive or civic leader in the crosshairs of this alarming allegation.

People are demanding the resignation of Rebekah Brooks, News International CEO (parent company of News of the World). As of this date, she refuses, citing she had no knowledge of the illegal activity. News of the World has closed its doors.

The story first broke in January 2011, and when it did Andy Coulson resigned as British Prime Minister David Cameron’s director of communication. Previous to that Coulson was Brooks’ deputy at News of the World.

It is alleged News of the World journalists hacked into the voicemail of the young murdered girl, Milly Dowler, who at that point was thought only to be missing. While the girl’s parents and friends called and left messages beseeching the thirteen year old to contact them, News of the World allegedly listened in and recorded the calls. As you can imagine, the young girl’s parents, family, and friends were devastated by not only her death, but also by the incredible intrusion and manipulation perpetrated by a news media only concerned with profit.

This scandal dominates the headlines in London, and is quickly gaining momentum all over the world, especially in America.

News of the World allowed editors and reporters to break the law in pursuit of news.

Illegal wiretapping is an incredible intrusion, but it gets much worse.

According to The Guardian, which broke the hacking story early in 2011, not only did News of the World listen in to the desperate calls from family and friends, the hacker, allegedly hired by News Corp (a U.S. owned Murdoch property), erased calls when the murdered girl’s message box filled up in order to allow others to leave more messages. When family discovered their messages had been cleared they assumed Milly had done it herself, and consequently was alive. Unfortunately, she had already been murdered.

News of the World deputy chief operating officer James Murdoch told reporters News International failed to “get to the bottom of repeated wrongdoing that occurred,” and as a result “wrongly concluded that these issues were confined to one reporter.”

Murdoch said the paper made statements to Parliament without being in the full possession of the facts. “This was wrong,” Murdoch added.

Rupert Murdoch is experienced enough to know that profuse apologies and admissions of contrition are called for, but I doubt, as do others, that it will be enough to protect his media empire from taking a major hit.

Britain’s media, bloodthirsty at the best of times, along with the country’s politicians, see this as a golden opportunity to knock the Murdoch’s to the ground, and will likely only be satisfied when one of them, Rupert or James, is forced to walk the plank in some fashion.

This isn’t the first time News of the World has been accused of hacking telephones. The P.I. who allegedly hacked into Milly’s phone, Glenn Mulcaire, plus an editor assigned to the royal beat at News of the World, Clive Goodman, were arrested and jailed in 2007 regarding an unrelated episode of plotting to hack phone messages of royal aides.

Some predict these most current events will be a turning point for journalism around the world, and that despicable acts by journalists will be reported and come to light more often, but as you know the news media industry is in an economic fight for its life, and as a consequence is very tough and resilient. Change takes time – so don’t hold your breath.

Carl Bernstein, one of the journalists who torpedoed Richard Nixon, charges that the hacking scandal is Murdoch’s Watergate. He goes on to say “Though Murdoch has strenuously denied any knowledge at all of the hacking and bribery, it’s hard to believe that his top deputies at the paper didn’t think they had a green light from him to use such untraditional reportorial methods.”

As I have cautioned the many politicians and executives I’ve media trained over the years, the best way to protect yourself from unsavory reporting is to understand how news media operates, and to be prepared.

Posted in Media Training, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

John O’Dwyer – Book Review of When the Headline Is YOU

John O’Dwyer of O’Dwyer’s Inside News of Public Relations & Marketing Communications in NYC reviewed my book, When the Headline Is YOU, and added his own unique twist to it.

John wrote,

“Even if you’re not regularly interacting with the media, the lessons Ansell teaches in the book apply just as well to business meetings and written correspondence such as e-mails.

For instance, Ansell explains how crucial it is to use stand-alone sentences to get a strong message across. This way you ensure that even if someone only hears or reads a portion of what you say or e-mail, they get the same point.”

You can read John’s entire review here, but do it today because it is in a subscription area of his site and he has graciously provided us with an ID & Password only good for July.

The ID is: allstar

Password: break

Posted in Media Training | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Keynote Speaker Embroiled in Controversy

What do you do when the keynote speaker you hired six months ago suddenly becomes front page headlines in a sex scandal just before he is scheduled to speak to your group?

Do you fire him?

Plow forward ignoring the controversy hoping it will fade?

Prepare your group and hope for the best?

On the surface it’s a tough question, but when put into perspective the answer is clear.

When SuccessfulMeetings.com interviewed me about this type of dilemma I said,

“You have to ask, How do we want our stakeholders to see us and perceive us?

If your company or organization is conservative, like a bank for example, the situation could be extremely challenging, but if your company is more liberal, and if the intended speaker was popular before his career hit the wall, you will probably have a sell out crowd.

In some ways it’s like a car accident. You want to look away, but you can’t.

Each situation has to be addressed on it’s own merit and circumstances.

During the “When Speakers Go Bad – Meeting Strategies” interview I also told reporter Leo Jakobson, “What are the words we would use to describe what we want to project to our stakeholders? Words like respected, honest, trustworthy, accountable, responsible. If I invite Governor Schwarzenegger, am I violating any of these attributes, which I claim to hold dear? If I have the word respectful in there -respectful of my customers, respectful of my stakeholders – I might choose to take a pass. But if it’s an organization like a Google or a Facebook, they might use words like leading edge, avant-garde, edgy. In that case, an invitation to Governor Schwarzenegger could still be appropriate.”

If you’re curious what companies and organizations have done in similar situations, take a  look at the Successful Meetings interview. Don’t panic. You have options.

……………………………………………………

Communication Strategy TIPS from the IABC

…………………………………………………….

A shot of me Emceeing the Quill Awards

Posted in Media Training, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The TRUTH Will Set You Free, But Timing Is Everything

The truth will set you free, but only if you fess up as soon as, or better still, before it goes mainstream.

If you do something stupid or embarrassing, and if you expect to be forgiven, the only way it will happen is if you admit your mistake before a reporter drags it out of you.

Hiding your indiscretion only exacerbates the problem when it goes public.

I wrote an article for the Huffington Post about Weiner. (It just occurred to me – Congressman Anthony Weiner has elevated through infamy his name to “One Word Status.” When I write Weiner, you know who I mean. Probably not what he had in mind for a career touchstone.)

For the last couple of weeks we’ve all snickered at the humorous play on words regarding his name, and his anatomy of the same name he’s been so loosely Tweeting.

Even a child knows there is absolutely no doubt that if Weiner would have immediately admitted his mistake he could have considerably lessened the negative impact on his career. I’m not suggesting the problem would have disappeared, not by a long shot, but the level of ridicule would not have been so intense.

Instead of being sent to his room to think about it, he lost all privileges.

Now, he’s not only considered a cheater, he’s a bona fide liar too.

And as it turns out, a really bad one, which makes him look stupid on a number of levels.

I know what you’re thinking, “Wouldn’t being a liar actually help him as a politician?”

Well, that’s a hurtful stereotype Weiner can now be credited with perpetuating.

He’s the exception, not the rule. Most politicians are morally responsible and will now give Weiner a wide berth and also speak out against him.

So remember, if you, your company, or organization are caught with your pants down in an uncompromising position, don’t pull a Weiner. Tell the truth. It will hurt much less.

Here’s the link to my Huffington Post piece.

Posted in Media Training, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Coast to Coast from CPRS to the IABC World Conference

 

The response from the PR Pros attending my plenary session at CPRS - Canadian Public Relations Society was phenomenal.

PR and business professionals from across the country attended the East Coast CPRS event, and it didn’t take long to see why they are the cream of the crop.

Their level of attention, questions, and input underscored how quickly news travels today.

It’s exciting in this social media era to do a presentation and incorporate today’s mainstream news headlines into it, and have people in the audience Tweet along as I talk to the room.

My session was entitled, “Maintaining Credibility When the Headline Is YOU!

It could not have been more appropriate. One of the HOT topics of the day is the real-time sex crisis meltdown of Congressman Anthony Weiner.

In a matter of days Weiner went from what appeared to be a forgivable personal mistake, to an all out career bloodletting.

I explained to the room that when you fail to tell the truth your story will undoubtedly follow a predictable arc, as described in my last Blog post – Part 2 of the Weiner saga.

Sometimes it’s a little disconcerting to see people Tweet as I speak. I used to wonder what they were saying, or if they were even paying attention. It’s always gratifying though to discover that people in the audience Tweet parts of my presentation word for word.

That’s why it is so important to get it right the first time when you talk with reporters.

We still don’t know exactly what Congressman Weiner has been up to behind closed doors – virtual or real, so it’s hard to say for sure if anything would have saved him, but we do know that because he lied and mismanaged his rapport with news media from the very start, there is now a spotlight on him that will brightly illuminate every little unethical thing he has ever done, and make it difficult, if not impossible for him to ever be trusted.

Last week he was just a guy who made a stupid sexting mistake.

It’s not a great position to be in, but with media planning it could be recoverable.

Now he’s ostracised and accused of being a sex addict and a liar.

I bet Arnold is glad to have Weiner pick up the baton and run with it.

I’m off to San Diego next week to speak at the IABC 2011 World Conference.

Not only will I be a presenter to another great group of PR Pros,

I’m also honored to be Hosting the Gold Quill Awards!

On your Mark! Get Set! Tweet!

Hope to see you in San Diego.

Please drop by and say hello.

Posted in Media Training, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment